A horary by Edwin Casael

Edwin Casael was a British astrologer who did a lot of work in horary. Alan Leo was impressed with Casael’s work and published the following question in his 1909 book on horary: “Will I benefit from my uncle’s will?  If not, who will benefit?”

The chart is cast for 29 March 1892 at 8:45 AM in Yorkshire, UK.  Because the city was not specified, I set the chart for York, a central location within Yorkshire.  Below is the chart with Placidus houses, the system in vogue at the time. I have generally followed Casael’s reasoning and have added some ideas of my own.


It is a Mars day during a Venus hour.

With Gemini on the Ascendant, Mercury ruler the querent, and the Moon is his co-ruler. Mercury is peregrine (without essential dignity) and occupies the fall of Saturn and the detriment of Venus.

The uncle is shown by the 6th house (3rd of the 4th). With Scorpio on the cusp, Mars rules the uncle.  Sagittarius on the cusp of the 7th (2nd of 5th) indicates that Jupiter signifies the uncle’s wealth.

Saturn rules the 8th house of wills in general. The Sun, ruler of Leo, governs the 4th house of inheritance.

To quote horary astrologer Olivia Barclay:

“THE FOURTH HOUSE is concerned with our beginning, our base, our ancestry, inheritance and father; with real estate, towns, castles and buildings; with the soil, fields, gardens and orchards; with the quality and nature of the ground one buys, whether it is woody, stony or barren. It is also the end of anything, and rules treasures hidden in the ground. A significator here may denote drowning, as with a chart I recently drew to know where a satellite would fall.”

“The 8th house rules the deceased’s estate, wills, legacies, dowry, and describes the sort of death. It rules undertakers.”

The querent’s significators (Mercury and the Moon) do not apply to the Sun or Jupiter (rulers of the 4th of inheritance and the 7th of the uncle’s wealth, respectively) and are in aversion to (have no connection by aspect with) Mars (the uncle) or Saturn (ruler of the 8th of wills).

A striking feature of this chart is the extremely close applying square from the Sun (exalted in Aries in the 11th) to Mars (exalted in Capricorn in the 8th).  The Sun rules the 4th of the querent’s inheritance and occupies the 11th of his hopes and wishes.  He is wishing for a nice inheritance from his uncle.  Mars rules the uncle and occupies the 8th of death and wills.  The querent hopes to received an inheritance from his deceased uncle’s will.  Mars receives the Sun in Aries by domicile and by face, but the Sun does not occupy any of the dignities of Mars, so the reception is not mutual.  The Sun “pushes” its significations to Mars for management, and the next aspect of Mars is a mutually applying trine to Saturn in the 5th house of the querent’s children. The aspect between the Sun and Mars, however, is a stressful square, which symbolizes severing and separating, and suggests that the querent’s inheritance will not come from his uncle’s will. Mars, however, is dignified (exalted) and receives the Sun and thus tries to be helpful to the Sun (ruler of the 4th of inheritance) by passing some of the uncle’s estate on to the querent’s children (Mars to trine Saturn in the 5th).

Casael notes that Venus mutually applies to a trine of Saturn in the 5th. Because Libra is intercepted in the 5th of children, Casael believes that the querent’s children will benefit from the will.  Saturn rules the 8th house of wills and legacies.

Posted in Astrology, horary | Tagged , , , , | Leave a comment

Masha’allah: Acquire a kingdom?

Masha’allah spent the year 791 writing up a number of horary charts of his clients. On 23 May 791 a client asked whether he would be granted a kingdom which he was seeking. Here is a chart set for Baghdad in the sidereal zodiac (Sri Yukteswar method) which approximates the one that appears in the original text.


It is a Moon day during a Moon hour. The querent must have been anxious because he asked the question first thing Monday morning when the sun had just risen.

Gemini rises, making Mercury Rx in Gemini the significator of the querent. His co-ruler is the Full Moon in Sagittarius, which is about to oppose Mercury. In fact, Moon and Mercury are mutually applying to an opposition, which will be the Moon’s next aspect. Thus, the Moon commits her disposition to Mercury.

What will Mercury do with the Moon’s disposition? Mercury Rx in Gemini receives the Sun, which rests just above the ascending degree, and the Sun and Mercury are mutually applying to a conjunction. Thus, Mercury commits his disposition (and that of the Moon) to the Sun, which now carries the ball for the querent, having received the disposition of the querent’s two rulers.

The quesited is the 10th house kingdom. With Aquarius on the 10th cusp, Saturn rules the quesited, and the Sun is nicely applying to sextile Saturn in Aries in the 11th house of the querent’s hopes and wishes.

Will the Sun be able to perfect the sextile to Saturn, indicating that the querent will get the desired position, or will some other planet interfere with the perfection?  The only planet capable of interfering is Mars, which lies at a degree intermediate between that of the Sun and Saturn in this chart.

Mars occupies a “bad” house (the 2nd) and is the dreaded malefic of the nocturnal sect in a day chart. Unfortunately, Mars applies to square Saturn, and the Mars/Saturn square will perfect before the Sun has a chance to sextile Saturn, thus destroying the querent’s hopes of getting his desired kingdom.

Masha’allah tells us that the querent learned that he would not be granted the kingdom on 28 May 791, the very day that Mars perfected its square to Saturn. Here is the chart for the morning of the day the querent got the bad news:

bad news


All original material on this blog is copyright Anthony Louis, 2017.

Posted in Astrology, horary | Tagged , , | 2 Comments

Another example of 12th parts in horary

The ancient Babylonians and the Hellenistic astrologers used twelfth-parts (dodecatemoria) of the signs of the zodiac.  The idea is that each sign can be projected onto the entire zodiac circle, with each 2.5 degrees (twelfth-part) of a sign being projected onto an entire sign of the horoscope wheel.

In the system of Manilius, the first 2.5 degrees of a sign is projected onto the sign itself, the 2nd 2.5 degrees onto the following sign, etc.  Thus, for example, the first 2.5 degrees of Virgo would project onto all of Virgo, the second 2.5 degrees of Virgo onto the next sign Libra, the third 2.5 degrees of Virgo onto the next sign Scorpio, and so on around the wheel.

Masha’allah in writing about “hidden things” noted that the twelfth-part of the Ascendant of a horary chart would reveal the querent’s concerns and intentions in consulting the astrologer.  He gave an example of the Ascendant in the 12th degree of Aries, which lies in the fifth 2.5 segment of Aries.  Hence the 5th Whole Sign house from Aries, which is Leo, reveals the querent’s concern or intention.  In his example there were no planets in Leo, so he looked to the ruler of Leo, the Sun, which happened to fall in Libra in the 7th Whole Sign house from Aries.  Masha’allah concluded that the querent wanted to know about a child (5th house) who was seeking the querent’s wife (7th house).  Had a planet been located in Leo, Masha’allah would have incorporated the meaning of that planet into his interpretation.

I recently came across a horary done by Olivia Barclay in which she argued in favor of her belief that, in horary charts, the 3rd house rather than the 2nd rules automobiles. Most traditional astrologers view cars as movable possessions, which are assigned to the 2nd house. Local trips you take in your car are matters symbolized by the 3rd house, but the car itself belongs functionally to the 2nd house..

Barclay cites the example of a horary question in which the querent asks if he will be able to purchase a rather expensive car:  “I have fallen in love with a 1937 Bentley. Will I be able to buy it?” The question was asked on 15 February 1987 at 4:42 PM GMT at 51N13, 1E25. Here is the chart:


It is a Sun day during a Saturn hour.

The querent is signified by the Sun (Leo Ascendant) and co-ruler Moon. The Sun resides in his detriment in Aquarius and opposes the Ascendant. The Moon in Virgo in the 2nd house of the querent’s money is peregrine (without essential dignity). The debilitated state of the querent’s rulers, especially the Moon in his house of money, suggests that he may not be able to afford the Bentley.

The Ascendant at 22 Leo 43 has its twelfth-part in Taurus, the sign on the MC. Since this is a question about making a purchase, the 10th house represents the price of the Bentley. The querent is concerned about the high price. There are no planets in the 10th, so Masha’allah tells us to consider the ruler of the 12th-part (Taurus), which is Venus in Capricorn in the 5th. Thus, the querent is concerned about the high price of something he loves (5th house). Capricorn describes Venus in the 5th, which signifies the thing that he loves and wants to buy, namely an old and venerable (Capricorn, ruled by Saturn) 1937 Bentley. The 5th house is associated with honey-colored things, so maybe the Bentley is honey-colored.

Barclay argued that because Venus was in the 5th house rather than Mercury, then the 3rd house (ruled by Venus in this chart) must signify cars.

Will the querent be able to buy the car? To answer this question we must look at the ruler of the car, which is Mercury because Virgo is on the cusp of the 2nd house of movable possessions. Interestingly, Mercury in Pisces conjoins the Part of Fortune (it is the car he treasures), but both are in the unfortunate 8th house which is a place of loss. Mercury (the car) is thus in aversion (inconjunct, disconnected) to the Leo Ascendant and the ruler of the Ascendant (the Sun). This failure of Mercury (the car) to connect with the Ascendant (the querent) is another argument that he will not be able to buy the car.

Is there any aspect forming between Mercury (the car) and the querent’s rulers (the Moon and the Sun)? No. The Sun is in aversion to Mercury, and the Moon is well past an opposition to Mercury. The querent and the Bentley do not come together in this chart.

Is there any agreement between the buyer (querent, Moon and Sun) and the seller (Saturn, Aquarius on 7th cusp)? No.  The Sun is separating from a sextile to Saturn, and the Moon (buyer) applies to Saturn (seller) by a square without reception. The Moon square Saturn without reception indicates that the two parties will not reach an agreement.

In short, Olivia Barcley’s argument about the 3rd house signifying cars in horary charts is without merit. The traditional teaching of the 2nd house ruling movable possessions still stands, and the method of 12th parts in horary from Masha’allah accounts for the honey color of the desired Bentley.

All original text in these posts is copyright Anthony Louis, 2017.

Posted in Astrology, horary | Tagged , , , , | 1 Comment

Masha’allah: Will a sick person recover?

The 8th century Jewish Muslim astrologer Masha’allah had a way of analyzing horary charts that is quite instructive. In the previous post I reviewed one of his charts about a 10th house matter. Here I would like to consider how Masha’allah analyzed a question from a sick person about whether he would live or die from his infirmity. The analysis below is drawn mainly from Masha’allah with some additional observations of my own.

From the description of the original chart, I was able to reconstruct a close approximation with modern software, using the following data: “Will I die or recover?” asked on 11 April 791 AD, near Basra in modern Iraq, 3:37 PM LMT, sidereal zodiac with method of Sri Yukteswar.


An infirm client who was in considerable pain asked Masha’allah the question on the afternoon of a Moon day during a Jupiter hour.

The dodecatemoria of the Ascendant (given by Masha’allah as being in the 15th degree of Virgo) lies in the region from 18 to 30 degrees of Aquarius in the 6th house of this chart. The querent’s intention (revealed by the dodecatemorion of the ascending degree) is to ask about his illness and chances for recovery. Venus in the 6th house, the Alcabitius house containing the 12th-part of the Ascendant, will play an important role in answering the question. The planet Saturn, which rules Aquarius, the sign of the 12th part of the Ascendant, lies in Aries on the cusp of the 8th house of death. The querent is worried about dying from his illness.

The querent is represented by Mercury (Virgo rising) and the Moon (always a co-ruler of the querent). Masha’allah would prefer to use Mercury, the primary ruler, to signify the querent BUT in this chart Mercury in the 8th is “in aversion” to (inconjunct) the Ascendant and is void of course. Thus, Mercury has no aspectual relationship with the sign Virgo or with any planet aspecting Virgo, and thus Mercury is incapable of managing Virgo’s significations. Mercury is currently completely at the mercy of the illness, being combust the Sun. Fortunately, Mercury is in the process of leaving combustion, which gives some prospect of an eventual improvement in the illness.

The Moon, however, lies in Taurus in the 9th house, which has a trine relationship with Virgo. Therefore, the Moon is more capable of signifying the querent. The Moon, like Mercury, is void of course. Since the Moon is involved in no aspectual activity, there is nothing to indicate a significant change in the querent’s medical condition for some time to come.  With the Moon void of course, not much change is happening and the illness is continuing its course. The querent’s illness will change, for better or worse, only after the Moon leaves Taurus and enters the next sign, Gemini, where it’s first aspect will be a square from the Moon to Venus at 6 Pisces 35.

Mars rules the 8th house of death and is quite powerful in the Midheaven, indicating the querent’s ongoing pain and fear of death. Neptune in Virgo on the Ascendant also reflects the chronic nature of the ailment.

Hellenistic astrologers also considered houses from the Part of Fortune. In this chart Fortuna lies in Libra, so that the Moon in Taurus occupies the 8th house of death from Pars Fortunae, again indicating that the querent is worried about dying from his illness.

When the Moon squares Venus, it will “commit its disposition” to Venus, which is the slower planet. Normally, Masha’allah would like there to be a reception of the Moon by Venus to lead to a successful outcome. Here the square of Moon to Venus will occur when the Moon reaches 7 Gemini 43 and Venus is at 7 Pisces 43.  At this moment the Moon will be in the term or bound of Jupiter with which Venus is in mutual reception. Thus, it seems that Masha’allah is viewing the Moon being in the term or bound of Jupiter (which is in mutual reception with Venus) as being equivalent to the Moon being received by Venus.

Venus will then carry the 1st house significations of the Moon (querent and his life force) in this chart. This is good news because Venus in Pisces is in mutual reception with Jupiter in Taurus. Jupiter is not applying to Saturn (the only planet heavier than Jupiter), so Jupiter has no one to whom to commit his disposition, and thus Jupiter becomes the final arbiter of the querent’s body and vitality, the significations which the Moon passed to Venus, and Venus passed on to Jupiter. The dispositing buck stops with Jupiter. In addition, Venus is only 14 degrees away from perfecting a sextile to Jupiter, which will occur on 26 April 791 (see chart below).

Masha’allah concludes that the querent’s illness will take a significant turn for the better after Venus bodily conjoins Jupiter in Taurus in about two and a half months. With the two benefics in mutual reception determining the outcome of the question, the querent will survive and eventually get better from his illness.

It appears that Masha’allah is thinking in terms of something like a relay race. The Moon (querent) handed its disposition over the Venus, which in turn handed the disposition over the Jupiter.  The buck will stop with Jupiter, but the end of the race will not take place until Venus bodily touches (conjoins with) Jupiter to bring the matter to its conclusion.

From just glancing at the original horary chart, you might think that Venus will square Mars (ruler of the 8th of death) before she perfects the sextile to Jupiter. Mars, however, is advancing in the zodiac along with Venus, so that the square from Venus to Mars occurs only after the  sextile of Venus to Jupiter takes place. Had Venus squared Mars (death) before sextiling Jupiter (recovery), the querent may well have died from his illness.

On April 22, transiting Mercury reached 18 of Taurus and conjoined Venus at 18 Pisces. Venus received Mercury in her domicile Taurus, and Mercury (the querent) committed his disposition to Venus as well. Thus, Venus has taken over the dispositions of both rulers of the querent and passed them on to Jupiter for final arbitration. Meanwhile, transiting Venus in Pisces is applying to a square to Mars in Gemini.

Below is the chart for April 26, cast for the same time as the question. You can see that Venus will sextile Jupiter well before she goes on to square Mars. With Mars ruling the 8th and being a natural signifier of bodily injury, the ongoing application of Venus to the square of Mars indicates that the infirmity will get worse before it gets better (at the time that Venus finally meets up with Jupiter in the heavens by bodily conjunction).


All original material in these posts is copyright Anthony Louis, 2017.

Posted in Astrology, horary | Tagged , , , , , , , , , | 1 Comment

Perfection by opposition: a horary by Masha’allah

Masha’allah (730-815 CE) was a Jewish astrologer from Basra who converted to Islam. His books were very influential in teaching the methods of horary astrology. In his work On Reception he gives several case examples, among which is the following, which demonstrates perfection by opposition. The interpretation below draws heavily from Masha’allah but also includes my own understanding of the chart.

A man asked the astrologer whether he would “acquire a kingdom” in the year 791 AD, that is, whether he would succeed in being granted rule over a particular region of the greater kingdom at the time. From Masha’allah’s description of the chart, it was cast for a location near Basra in modern Iraq on 21 April 791 at about 10:13 AM LMT.  I am unable to reproduce exactly the positions in the original text, but a chart cast in the sidereal zodiac according to the method of Sri Yukteswar and with Alcabitius houses comes very close. Here is my modern version of the chart:


With Cancer rising, the querent is signified by the Moon in Libra in the 4th house. The man with whom the querent must negotiate to obtain the position is shown by the Capricorn 7th house, ruled by Saturn.

Saturn happens to be in the 10th house of the position which the querent wishes to acquire. Aries is the sign of Saturn’s fall, so the querent must negotiate with a “fallen” or corrupted Saturn (7th house ruler) to secure his advancement. Perhaps this man will require some kind of bribe in exchange for assisting the querent. Clearly Masha’allah did not know about the existence of Pluto, but it is striking that on the day of the horary question Pluto was stationary and turning Retrograde in the 7th house, which symbolizes the man the querent had to negotiate with to get the advancement he desired.

The Moon (querent) occupies the exaltation of Saturn but applies to the “fallen” Saturn through an opposition. It will not be easy for the querent to secure his promotion. With Saturn in its fall, the querent (Moon) may need to grovel before Saturn, or in the verancular, “kiss his ass” and “grease his palm.” And because Saturn is involved, the querent can expect hardships and delays in obtaining the position.

Saturn’s placement in the 10th of career describes the desired post. Saturn in his fall is debilitated and despised. Fall is the opposite of exaltation in which everyone is singing Saturn’s praises. In his fall, everyone is heaping insults upon him. Thus, even if the querent obtains the position, there will be something about it that he hates, or those whom he governs may despise him.

With Aries on the cusp of the 10th and the Sun (exalted in Aries) therein, the significator of the desired position is best symbolized by the Sun, a natural ruler of royalty and those in authority.

The outcome was that the querent did receive the command but there was a delay of about 15 days, as indicated by the fact that the Moon (the querent) reached the domicile of the quesited (the 10th house) and  conjoined 7th-ruler Saturn 14 days after the question, indicating that he was appointed on that day. Masha’allah’s idea seems to be that the querent’s significator,the Moon, being received by Saturn in his exaltation (Libra) and then opposing Saturn turns over the matter to Saturn as its final arbiter. The conclusion of the matter will only occur when the Moon (querent) bodily conjoins Saturn which received the disposition of the Moon and became its final arbiter. Because the Moon is at the beginning of Libra and will need to reach Aries to conjoin Saturn, Masha’allah estimates that it will take about 15 days for this conjunction to occur (since the Moon moves through six signs of the zodiac in half a month).

In addition, though Masha’allah does not mention this fact, it took 15 days of ephemeris time for the Moon to reach the position of the Sun (the command) in the 10th house. Here is the original horary chart advanced exactly 15 days from the time of the question. As you can see, the Moon (the querent) has moved to conjoin the position of the Sun (the position desired) in the original chart. In addition, Mars, which rules the 10th and disposes the horary Sun, has moved into the Cancer 1st house, which rules the querent.


It is also interesting in the chart for 15 days later, Venus in Aries disposes the Sun, now in Taurus. Venus is received by Mars in Cancer in the 1st and has just completed a square to Mars, indicating his receipt of the position with some stress (the square) involved.

As the chart indicated (fallen Saturn in the 10th), the querent was not especially happy with the new position. In Ben Dykes translation, the new command is called “a middling thing” that was “of little advantage” and of paltry usefulness. The fact that a debilitated Saturn in the 10th, being opposed by the Moon (querent), did not entirely deny his advancement was shown by the strength of the Moon, Saturn and the Sun in the angles of the chart, especially with the Moon (querent), so close to the IC, making the Moon the most angular planet. Even though Saturn being in its fall in the 10th indicated that the position was hateful, the angularity of the significators “fixed”, that is, settled the matter of receiving the position in his favor.

This chart is an example of William Lilly’s dictum that “I have rarely seen anything brought to perfection by this way of opposition, but the querent had been better the thing being undone…” (CA, p. 125). In other words, be careful what you ask for; you just may get it.

Original material on this blog is copyright Anthony Louis, 2017.

Posted in Astrology, horary | Tagged , , , , , | 1 Comment

Puzzling receptions in a horary chart

The issue of reception in horary can be quite confusing. For example, Nina Gryphon stirred up a hornet’s nest of controversy when she published a blog about Bonatti’s idea that a planet being received by malefic planet abates the infortune’s malice. This led to an extensive debate on Nina’s Facebook page about reception. The current availability of English translations of more and more ancient texts seems to add fuel to the fire. With this debate in mind, I’ve been looking at horary charts with a much keener eye to the role that reception plays in the outcome.

Recently I came across a puzzling chart published by an astrologer named Dirius in Buenos Aires. Dirius explained that “around a month ago I ran into this girl I used to work with; I always had a crush on her but she used to have a boyfriend; she is now single so I asked out to dinner.” Being an astrologer, he then asked the horary question, “Will she go out with me?”  The question was asked on 17 November 2014 at 6:56 PM in Buenos Aires. The date took place on 2 December 2014, some 15 days after the question. Dirius added, “Please feel free to use and learn from this chart,” so here it is:


Dirius is the querent, signified by the Taurus Ascendant which is ruled by Venus in Sagittarius in the 7th Regiomontanus house. His co-ruler is the Moon in Libra (in aversion to the Ascendant), also ruled by Venus. The Moon in the 5th indicates his emotional focus on romance.

The quesited is signified by the 7th house with Scorpio on the cusp, which makes Mars her primary ruler. Mars is exalted in Capricorn in the 9th and occupies the Dorothean term of Venus. This is a day chart, so Mars is also in the triplicity of Venus. In other words, Venus receives Mars in her term and triplicity.

There is no aspect between Venus and Mars, so the primary significators don’t show a date happening.

Mars (exalted at 16 Capricorn 52) does, however, apply to trine the Ascendant at 17 Taurus 38 (Taurus being the detriment or exile of Mars). Even though Mars applies to trine the Ascendant from the “good” 9th house, the Ascendant is in a sign detrimental to Mars. The fact that Ascendant-ruler Venus receives Mars in her term and triplicity makes Mars feel like a welcome guest, so the date may well go forward but it will be up to Venus (the host of Mars) to make the date happen. Receptions are guest/host relationships.

Next we must look at the Moon, the querent’s cosignificator. The Moon will square Mars in 15 degrees (the date took place 15 days after the question). The Moon in Libra lies in the detriment of Mars (which rules the opposite sign Aries), and Mars in Capricorn occupies the detriment of the Moon (which rules the opposite sign Cancer). This is kind of a negative mutual reception by detriments, and the planets are applying to a stressful square. I would interpret this square between significators in each other’s detriment as a negative testimony. In other words, either the date will not happen or it will go forward with much difficulty.

If I understand him correctly, astrologer John Frawley would interpret Mars lying in the detriment of the Moon as meaning that Mars (the quesited) feels hatred toward what the Moon signifies (the querent). Similarly, the Moon (the querent) in Libra, the detriment of Mars, would indicate the Moon’s hatred toward what Mars signifies (the quesited). Since neither the querent nor the quesited hate each other, and if fact went out on a date, this approach does not make sense in interpreting this chart.

The outcome:

They managed to arrange a date to go out to dinner. Darius was late at work and had to pick her up late. When they got to the restaurant, it was full and they did not have a reservation, so they had to wait for a table to open. Then the date went fine. I don’t know if they continued to see each other after the date or if the relationship just fizzled out afterward.

What puzzles me about this chart are the conflicting testimonies, the square between significators in each other’s detriments, and the role that the receptions played in the outcome.

Addendum (14 April 17): Recently I was reading Ben Dyke’s translation of Sahl ibn Bishr (c. 786–~845) who comments that the 5th house is a place of love and seeking the friendship of women. In the Whole Sign house system, Mercury would rule this querent’s 5th house of dating; and in the chart Mercury is received by Mars (the querent) in his domicile Scorpio. In addition, the Descendent (quesited) is received by Mercury (the date) in his term. Mercury applies to sextile Mars in three degrees and goes on to conjoin the Descendant in less than four degrees, indicating that the date will take place within a few weeks time.


Posted in Astrology, horary | Tagged , , , , , , , , | 2 Comments

Regiomontanus vs. Whole Sign in Horary

Recently I’ve been experimenting with the difference between Regiomontanus and Whole Sign houses in horary by recasting published charts with known outcomes in both house systems.  On YouTube I came across a horary presented by Peter G. Burns of the Ambrosia Academy of Astrology about a business woman who asked whether her flight would be cancelled due to volcanic ash in the air over Australia.  She needed to get to an important business seminar in Sydney.  Here is the chart in both Regiomontanus (on the left) and Whole sign (on the right) houses.


Following Lilly, Peter used Regiomontanus houses in which the 9th house of flights has Virgo on the cusp, making Mercury (a natural ruler of travel by air) the significator of the flight.  It then becomes necessary to explain the combustion of Mercury by the Sun the the application of Mercury and the Sun to the Moon’s South Node which is in its fall in Gemini.  Fortunately, Mercury rules Gemini and has triplicity there, so Mercury is quite dignified.  (Although combustion of a significator is usually quite damaging to a horary question, in this case the Sun occupies the domicile of the significator and the effect of combustion is thereby minimized due to the reception.)  Apparently this woman was able to take the flight to Sidney and attend her seminar.

The Whole Sign chart is much clearer and easier to interpret.  The 9th Whole Sign house is Libra, ruled by Venus in Gemini.  Venus is peregrine, but it is a night chart and Venus is the benefic of the sect in power and thus the most auspicious planet in the chart.  Venus applies to trine the Ascendant degree and then moves on to trine Saturn, ruler of the Ascendant, showing that the querent will be able to take her flight as planned without impediment.

The mutual reception between Venus (in the term and domicile of Mercury) and Mercury (in the term of Venus) reinforces the interpretation of an auspicious flight (Venus/Mercury).  In addition, Mercury’s next aspect is a square to the Part of Fortune at 20 Virgo 50, and Mercury receives the Part of Fortune which lies in Virgo, the domicile and exaltation of Mercury.

It is of some concern that Saturn, which rules the querent, is stationary (not moving) in the 9th of flights.  Fortunately, Saturn turns direct in less than 48 hours, which may mean that the flight delays will have ended within two days.

In addition, the protective and beneficial fixed star Spica at 24 Libra 00 conjoins the MC, which lies in the 9th house of flights in the Whole Sign chart and also occupies the term of Venus, which rules the 9th house.  Spica conjunct MC in the 9th signifies a favorable business trip.

While both Regiomontanus and Whole Signs give the same answer, the Whole Sign chart (see below) is much more direct and obvious in its answer.


Posted in Astrology, horary | Tagged , , | 2 Comments