The Birth Chart of Charles E.O. Carter

Recently I was reading a book by Charles Carter (31 Jan 1887 — 4 Oct 1968) and wondered what his birth chart looked like. A quick internet search revealed that there are several charts, all within a few minutes and birth locations of each other, which all purport to be his natal figure. The variety of such charts prompted me to try to discover the “true” birth chart of this noted astrologer. The earliest reference I could find was a photocopy of the opening pages of the 1929 (first) publication of his book Symbolic Directions in Modern Astrology:

Carter included a copy of the birth chart he was using for himself in the 1929 first edition of this book. His chart has 16 Libra 51 rising with a Midheaven of 22 Cancer 00, cast for a birthplace of PARKSTONE, in Dorsetshire, UK, 31 January 1887.

Some sites online use “Poole, UK” as Carter’s birthplace, but the site claims that Carter definitely said his birth location was Parkstone, which is nearby: “Charles Carter gave his birth data quite distinctly as 31st January 1887, 10.55 pm, Parkstone, Dorsetshire, England, 50N43, 02W00.” In this quote it is not clear whether Carter meant GMT or LMT. In addition, he has rounded the coordinates of his birthplace to the nearest minute of arc. Curious about the more precise coordinates of Parkstone, I checked google maps:

Google maps locates Parkstone at 50.73247 N and -1.95219 W, that is,
50 n 43′ 57″, 01 w 57′ 8″ (which is very close to Carter’s rounded values of 50 n 43′, 02 w 00′), so we can eliminate the charts which use Poole as his birthplace.

Another source ( gives the coordinates of Parkstone as Latitude: 50° 43′ 47.78″ N, Longitude: -1° 56′ 41.71″ W.

The program Solar Fire gives the coordinates of Parkstone as Latitude 50° N 43′ 05″, Longitude 01° W 57′ 26″. Since I don’t know the exact street address of Carter’s birth in Parkstone, UK, I will use the Solar Fire coordinates in the rest of this post.

Using Solar fire, I was able to generate a birth chart very close to the one which Carter published for himself in 1929 by using a birth time of 10:59:32 PM GMT (which corresponds to 10:51:42 PM LMT). Carter apparently said he was born at 10:55 PM (whether he used GMT or LMT is not clear). However, since England began using GMT in 1884, three years before Carter’s birth, it is likely that his recorded birth time was 10:55 PM GMT and that other charts which he used were rectifications of the recorded birth time.

Interestingly, in the 2nd edition (1946) of Symbolic Directions in Modern Astrology, Carter’s birth chart has been modified to give an Ascendant of 17 Libra 15 with a Midheaven of 22 Cancer 27, which would correspond to a birth time of 11:01:29 PM UT.

The widely used site gives Carter’s birth data as: 31 January 1887 at 23:01 GMT (11:01 PM GMT) in Parkstone, England, 50n47, 2w20, apparently citing Carter himself. There is an additional comment that Fowler gives a birth time 10:55 PM, from Carter, who rectified his own chart to an MC of 21 Cancer 53, corresponding to a rectified birth time of 10:59:02 PM GMT.

On what basis might Carter have rectified his recorded birth time of 10:55 PM GMT to a time of 10:59:02 PM GMT? In his books on symbolic directions (1929) and the astrology of accidents (1932), as well as in his lectures, Carter was quite taken with the accident of his own daughter on 16 August 1926 when she fell through a skylight and landed 13 feet below onto stone steps, rendering her unconscious. Fortunately, she was not seriously injured, but finding his daughter unconscious in a heap of glass on stone steps must have been a traumatic event, etched into the memory of the astrologer. My hunch is that Carter used his daughter’s accident to rectify his chart for the 1929 publication of his book, which discussed the incident.

Using his daughter’s accident and primary directions without latitude, Placidus proportional semi-arc method, with the Naibod rate and the coordinates of Parkstone from Solar Fire, I rectified his chart to the following:

Carter’s chart rectified using the date of his daughter’s accident on 16 August 1926. This chart is very close to the one published by Carter in his 1929 text Symbolic Directions in Modern Astrology, which had an Ascendant of 16 Libra 51′ instead of 16 Libra 44′ as in this chart. This difference may simply be due to Carter’s use of rounded coordinates for his birth location and the ephemerides available to him in 1929. The chart given for Carter in has an Asc of 16 Libra 53′ and an MC of 21 Cancer 59′, so it appears to be a variation of the same rectified chart.

To rectify the chart, I assumed that Mars in the 5th of Carter’s natal chart could signify a dangerous period and possibly a serious accident or injury befalling his daughter. As calculated in Solar Fire, by primary direction at the Naibod rate, Mars arrives at the IC (meridian axis) on 16 August 1926, the day his daughter crashed through the skylight and fell onto stone steps below.

Carter’s primary directions (as calculated in Solar Fire, using Placidus semi-arc, Naibod key) for the summer of 1926, which form the basis for his rectified chart. Mars comes to the meridian axis in mid-August when his daughter had the serious accident, and Venus came to the opposition of Saturn during this same period. Both Venus and Mars are closely associated with Carter’s natal 5th house of children.

In addition, during the summer of 1926, by primary direction (Placidus proportional semi-arc method), Carter’s natal 8th-ruler Venus (which is on the cusp of the natal 5th house and conjunct Ketu) came to the opposition of his 5th house ruler Saturn, a natural signifier of falls and gravity-related accidents. Saturn, signifier of his daughter, is square Uranus in the 12th in Carter’s birth chart, suggesting the child’s proneness to accidents.

Venus, for her part, conjoins the cusp of the 5th, rejoices in the 5th, is a natural signifier of young women, and is con-significator and karaka of the 5th of children. Finally, in Carter’s natal chart Venus rules the 8th of death, so that when primary directed Venus opposed Saturn (ruler of the 5th of children), Carter was harshly confronted with the mortality of his daughter.

The fact that Carter slightly modified his birth chart in the 2nd edition of Symbolic Directions in Modern Astrology several years later may simply mean that he continued to rectify his chart with new events that occurred after the defining moment of the serious and potentially fatal accident of his daughter.

About Anthony Louis

Author of books about astrology and tarot, including TAROT PLAIN AND SIMPLE, HORARY ASTROLOGY, and THE ART OF FORECASTING WITH SOLAR RETURNS.
This entry was posted in Astrology and tagged , , , , , . Bookmark the permalink.

4 Responses to The Birth Chart of Charles E.O. Carter

  1. Scott Silverman says:

    Great post!

    On Thu, Sep 16, 2021 at 9:45 PM Anthony Louis – Astrology & Tarot Blog wrote:

    > Anthony Louis posted: ” Recently I was reading a book by Charles Carter > (31 Jan 1887 — 4 Oct 1968) and wondered what his birth chart looked like. > A quick internet search revealed that there are several charts, all within > a few minutes and birth locations of each other, which a” >

  2. Tom Callanan says:

    Mine and Morin’s sworn enemy. Well that’s an exaggeration. Carter is the man most responsible for the switch from using ingress charts in mundane astrology to national charts. He wasn’t the first to suggest this, but clearly the most influential.

    Carter reasoned that most, in fact just about all, major astrologers “missed” WWII. They predicted peace. Carter reasoned the fault must lie in the tools they used, ingress charts, and in his 1950 booklet, Political Astrology, suggested that national charts be used instead. The revolution has rarely looked back. What Carter missed, however, is that one French astrologer, Jean Hieroz, correctly predicted the outbreak of war in 1939 and he used ingress charts and Morin’s mundane methods. One might be forgiven for not understanding why Carter thought it necessary to completely change mundane astrology rather than work with the methods of the one guy who got it right. He might not have known.

    The entire story of Hieroz prediction is in an appendix to Book 25 of Astrologia Gallica and it repays careful reading. Cast your own charts, though. The ones in the book are difficult to read.

    • Tom,
      Great to hear from you. As you know, I’m also a fan of Morinus. Years ago I reviewed Carter’s pre-WWI comments in which he predicted that the UK would not enter the war. His astrology was quite superficial and sloppy, as I recall. His treatment of symbolic directions was disappointing; if you invent enough different symbolic directing measures, at least one of them is bound to “hit”. Carter did not seem to have a good grasp of traditional astrology. For example, in his discussion of his daughter’s accident, he mentions that he only recently became aware of primary directions, which were a staple of astrological prediction for the previous 2000 years. He was also quite dismissive of horary astrology. What I value about him, though, is his empirical approach, that is, his willingness to look at large numbers of charts to try to figure out what is going on astrologically.

  3. Pingback: The Birth Chart of Charles E.O. Carter - Charm Wish PR

Leave a Reply

Fill in your details below or click an icon to log in: Logo

You are commenting using your account. Log Out /  Change )

Google photo

You are commenting using your Google account. Log Out /  Change )

Twitter picture

You are commenting using your Twitter account. Log Out /  Change )

Facebook photo

You are commenting using your Facebook account. Log Out /  Change )

Connecting to %s